Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
On 9 Feb 2006, Christopher Martin uttered the following:
> No, we'd like the issue settled in a _legitimate_ fashion. And I
> take umbrage at your insinuations.
May I take umbrage at your insinuation that the vote to modify
the social contract was "illegitimate"?
Actually, the amount of umbrage I can bring myself to
experience is somewhat tepid, since I am not sure I care a
whit about your opinion anyway.
In Lexington, Kentucky, it's illegal to carry an ice cream cone in
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C