Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:26:49PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Hint: because the Release Manager pointed out that the first vote
>> required the removal of GFDL docs from sarge, and people felt that it
>> was not worth delaying the release of sarge to do this.
>
> Actually, it was mostly about firmware, see
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/04/msg00074.html
Thank you for the correction.
Reply to: