Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

[md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)]

On Feb 09, Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:

> > This may be annoying for you, but it's a fact that there is an
> > interpretation of the old wording which has been used for years to
> > accept non-free documentation into main.
> How is this relevant?
It shows that there was a widely accepted meaning of what "software" is
in the context of the DFSG, so the change was not "editorial".

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature