[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract



md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) writes:

> On Feb 09, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> This was necessary only because the release manager believed the changes
>> to be non-editorial. I cannot even understand an interpretation of the
>> old wording that can lead us to accept non-free documentation into main.

> This may be annoying for you, but it's a fact that there is an
> interpretation of the old wording which has been used for years to
> accept non-free documentation into main.

How is this relevant?




Reply to: