[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG



On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:05:12AM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:

> > Wow, you think it's "prudent" to rely on an external organization with whom
> > you do not have a contract for your compliance with a license?  Most
> > businesses would *not*, and I doubt most judges would either.

> Aren't those same organizations relying on us to, say, not attempt to
> distribute Oracle as a .deb in main?

Are you telling me you don't see any difference between trusting Debian to
fulfill *our* obligations under copyright law and relying on us for the
fulfillment of *their* obligations?

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: