Re: Alternate proposal for Declassification of debian-private archives
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> writes:
> As Matthew pointed out in  this expectation of privacy isn't really
> that strong, fundamentally because -private is open to anyone who joins
> Debian, and Debian's open to anyone joining it.
>  http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2005/11/msg00033.html
Through the New Maintainer process, which isn't exactly everyone *and*
which requires that anyone joining agrees to a fairly extensive set of
conduct guidelines. Because of that, I'm not convinced by this
counter-argument, except possibly for those messages sent to
debian-private back when it was far easier to join the project (and even
still, I think there was always a weeding factor).
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>