[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR Proposal 2: Declassification of -private

Em Sex, 2005-11-18 às 16:09 +1000, Anthony Towns escreveu:
> Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
> ---
> In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
> seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
> made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
> This process will be undertaken under the following constraints:
>   * The Debian Project Leader will delegate one or more volunteers
>     to form the "debian-private declassification team".
>   * The team will automatically declassify and publish posts made to
>     that list that are three or more years old, with the following
>     exceptions:
>     - the author and other individuals quoted in messages being reviewed
>       will be contacted, and allowed between four and eight weeks
>       to comment;
>     - posts that reveal financial information about individuals or
>       organisations other than Debian, will have that information
>       removed;
>     - requests by the author of a post for that post not to be published
>       will be honoured;
>     - posts of no historical or other relevance, such as vacation
>       announcements, or posts that have no content after personal
>       information is removed, will not be published, unless the author
>       requests they be published;
>     - comments by others who would be affected by the publication of
>       the post will also be taken into account by the declassification
>       team;
>     - the list of posts to be declassified will be made available to
>       developers two weeks before publication, so that the decisions
>       of the team may be overruled by the developer body by General
>       Resolution, if necessary -- in the event such a resolution is
>       introduced (ie, proposed and sponsored), the declassification
>       and publication of messages specified by the resolution will be
>       deferred until the resolution has been voted on.
> ---
> The changes since the original:
>    - authors have a veto over publication (Manoj's changes)
>    - people quoted in messages rather than other recipients should be
>      contacted
>    - security problems don't get special treatment; they can be vetoed
>      by the post's author though
>    - specific details for overriding the team's decisions by the
>      developers

Ok, Following what I've said in the last post, I second this proposal.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente

Reply to: