also sprach Branden Robinson <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005.03.15.0448 +0100]: > 2) Secondly, I understand the writeup Steve posted to be a proposal, Apparently, a lot of people did not. I also see a difference between discussing possible solutions (somewhere else than a Wiki) or voting between alternatives, and throwing out a proposal that is the result of a lot of brainpower, thus has a somewhat "decided" feel to it, and then asking people to say "yes" or "no". Also, just the way that people are using "SCC" -- as if it has been a part of Debian all along -- makes me feel uncomfortable. It's like a company that announces a product, which they may or may not market; however, they already have name, logo, design, and a marketing strategy for it. > I welcome discussion, but I would discourage us from fighting > tomorrow's battle before today's are won. I exhort all of us > (myself included) to do our utmost to get sarge releasable -- > on all 11 architectures. That is a feat to my knowledge never > approached by any other GNU/Linux distribution. Sarge is > definitely something we'll be able to be proud of. Amen. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature