The current Technical Committee is inactive; in the past two years they have only made two rulings: * 2004-06-24 Bug #254598: amd64 is a fine name for that architecture. * 2004-06-05 Bug #164591, Bug #164889: md5sum </dev/null should produce the bare md5sum value. The md5sum ruling was a bug submitted, referred and decided by the Technical Committee chairman. In effect, he used his power in such a manner to expect that any bug he files will lead to a tech-ctte decision. Do you believe that the tech-ctte should be relatively inactive? Or do you believe that an inactive Technical Committee is a bad thing? If the latter, do you propose (as they would be your delegates) to make any changes to the current make-up of the committee. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part