[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

The secret is out. A new cabal is trying to cleanse Debian of women through 
pure irritation and MJ is in on the action. Gentlemen, steel yourselves for a 
future consisting entirely of endless pedantic hair-splitting over policy, 
very little actual technical work and homoerotic all-male skinny dipping geek 
parties at exotic locales.*

Dammit man! It's a list of women in Debian! Men are not women! Get a hobby!

*Andreas... I hate to bust your balls but the concept of a Debian Developer 
skinny dipping party turns my stomach. I cannot resist its comedic lure.

On Wednesday 09 March 2005 5:52 pm, MJ Ray wrote:
> In fact, I suspect the correlation is not very strong.
> > [...] more of a personal issue "ok, so there's the linuxchix, what's
> > wrong with Debian?"
> linuxchix specifically exclude men from some meetings and
> facilities. Absence of a similar group was a feature. It's a
> shame that things deteriorated to the point one was created.
> > [...] As there's is absolutely no seggregation in the debian-women
> > environment, men can benefit, and I'm sure *do* benefit, from this
> > wellcoming climate too.
> Is a bus with a whites-only section at the front segregated?
> Really, it is simple to make the debian-women project not
> segregated, but it seems clear from
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-women/2004/08/msg00100.html
> that segregation is intended for some parts. Why wouldn't
> profiling friendly male contributors help?

Ean Schuessler, CTO
214-720-0700 x 315
Brainfood, Inc.

Reply to: