[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Analysis of the ballot options

On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:29:01PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield:
> > Ah yes, that's another of those common memes. It's completely
> > unfounded. There is no reason to think that it would take a long time
> > to evict all the offending material - it's trivial in most cases.
> The discussion about fonts, closed and semi-closed data formats, and
> data formats which are inherently lossy and for which we lack the
> lossless source files has not really started yet.  It will take months
> until Debian agrees on policies for these cases, and further classes
> of non-programs which aren't on the radar at this point probably
> exist, too.

Nonsense. There is generally nothing to discuss, and where there is,
it was settled a long time ago. Anybody who reads -legal could tell
you that. I don't know who has been going around claiming otherwise,
but it's pure fabrication.

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: