Re: Analysis of the ballot options
* Andrew Suffield (email@example.com) [040621 00:40]:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:29:01PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Andrew Suffield:
> > > Ah yes, that's another of those common memes. It's completely
> > > unfounded. There is no reason to think that it would take a long time
> > > to evict all the offending material - it's trivial in most cases.
> > The discussion about fonts, closed and semi-closed data formats, and
> > data formats which are inherently lossy and for which we lack the
> > lossless source files has not really started yet. It will take months
> > until Debian agrees on policies for these cases, and further classes
> > of non-programs which aren't on the radar at this point probably
> > exist, too.
> Nonsense. There is generally nothing to discuss, and where there is,
> it was settled a long time ago. Anybody who reads -legal could tell
> you that. I don't know who has been going around claiming otherwise,
> but it's pure fabrication.
Perhaps you may want to answer to Florians reasons, instead of saying
"Nonesense" and "pure fabrication".
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C