On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:32:00PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > It's interesting, though, that not only did no one else propose a GR to > > support that policy at the time, but you didn't propose a GR to set the > > policy you believed was correct either -- [...] > I had other priorities (specifically the last few non-electoral votes > we've had), and at the time the voting system was still > fucked. There was no problem with the voting system except in dealing with votes that mixed supermajority and non-supermajority options. Overriding a delegate's decision and supporting a delagate's decision are both free of supermajority requirements. > It takes a really bloody long time to get things of this magnitude > done within Debian. *shrug* That was entirely your choice. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> Don't assume I speak for anyone but myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.''
Description: Digital signature