Re: Proposal F on the ballot now.
* Graham Wilson (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040527 17:40]:
> On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:11:22AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Graham Wilson (email@example.com) [040527 06:25]:
> > > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:26:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > > Proposal F got the requisite number of seconds, and is now on
> > > > the ballot. The discussion period has been reset. If someone would
> > > > like to provide a 40 char description of the proposal for the ballot,
> > > > I'll modify my draft ballot.
> > > Maybe:
> > >
> > > [###] Choice F: Re-affirm current social contract
> > No. The social contract says "our priorities are our users and the
> > free software community". That's something quite different.
> Indeed it does. However, under the social contract as it is now we will
> not be releasing Debian sarge with known non-free components, and that
> is the intent of this amendment. Therefore, it re-affirms the current
> social contract.
You know that there are other interpretations of the social contract.
Why do you think it appropriate to give one interpretation the
official blessing before doing a GR on this?
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C