Re: Discussion - On proposal E (Transition Guide)
On Tue, 25 May 2004 20:07:02 +0200, Robert Millan <email@example.com> said:
> I'm concerned about proposal E. I believe it essentialy means that
> any changes that are made to the DFSG or SC won't have any effect if
> they make them more strict, but they will have effect if they relax
> them. Is that the intended in "[..] for a limited time, Debian will
> not be compliant with the new Social Contract"?
> Seems like the use of the word "limited" is ambigous. Any amount of
> time is "limited" by a greater one.
> Any comments on this?
I am willing to trust that people implementing the release
policies are reasonably competent, and shall not be working against
the spirit of a foundation document. So limited is whatever
reasonable time it is that it takes for us to meet the directives of
the social contract.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C