Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:34:20 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040524133420.J13880@links.magenta.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040524085237.GB19351@azure.humbug.org.au>; from aj@azure.humbug.org.au on Mon, May 24, 2004 at 06:52:37PM +1000
References: <00fe01c440ea$4c512dd0$d9ae4e3e@t21roska> <[🔎] 20040521234113.GQ5026@seventeen> <[🔎] 20040523213358.GA26514@kos.to> <[🔎] 20040523174406.H13880@links.magenta.com> <[🔎] 20040524085237.GB19351@azure.humbug.org.au>

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 06:52:37PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Any textual basis for that claim?

Constitution, 4.1.5.3  "A Foundation Document requires a 3:1 majority
for its supersession."

-- 
Raul

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

References:
- Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
  - From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
  - From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
- Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: GR: Alternative editorial changes to the SC
Next by Date: Re: Ready to vote on 2004-003?
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
Next by thread: Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread