Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 00:33:58 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040523213358.GA26514@kos.to>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040521234113.GQ5026@seventeen>
References: <00fe01c440ea$4c512dd0$d9ae4e3e@t21roska>

I Second this proposal.

Short and sweet and lacks political hubbub. Just decide that we
shouldn't have to change release policy 6 months after the release
was supposed to happen. Why sould really need to modify SC or 
foundation document for saying that?

-- 
Riku Voipio  	       | riku.voipio at iki.fi         |
kirkkonummentie 33     |    +358 44 5000343          --+--
02140 Espoo            |                               |
dark> A bad analogy is like leaky screwdriver          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>

References:
- Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
  - From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
Next by Date: Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
Next by thread: Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread