Re: Ready to vote on 2004-003?
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 12:40:34PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> There's no need to have a vote here at all: if you can convince the
> technical ctte that the social contract doesn't mean what I think it says,
> or can come up with a consensus that we don't care about being able to
> have a literal interpretation of the social contract, then that's fine:
> they can set the release policy back to what it was with no argument
> from me.
> And on this issue, it's been answered by the project once. If the
> project's going to change its mind, how is the project going to make
> sure its new stance is any more sensible than the old one? Relying on
> the expedient solution to be the best one seems... flawed to me.
You answered all the interrogations I had about your relations with this
Imagine a large red swirl here.