On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 10:27:49AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On 15 May 2004 21:11:02 +0100, Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net> said: > > The full texts of the proposals being voted on can be found on > > http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_004 > > > They have been been omitted here due to their (combined) length. > > Please go to the above URL and read the actual proposals before > > voting. > > Why do developers have to be told this? Let me turn the question around. Is there any harm in doing this? Apart from that, yes, I think developers have to be told. Their curiosity has to be tickled, to avoid that people who aren't really interested just say "oh, postponing doesn't sound really good, because I want to release now. Let's not postpone." Having more information is a good thing; and while I could understand reasoning for not wanting the full rationales in this mail, I second that the ballot should either contain those full rationales, or verbosely say it doesn't. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature