Re: Short descriptions of GR proposals on ballot
Scripsit Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 02:20:01PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > 3. A 3:1 supermajority want to fix the problem in some way or
> > another, but they disagree internally about which of the
> > proposals is a good fix.
> They must not just disagree about which proposals are good, but for each
> proposal there's another significant group who think that that proposal
> would actively harm debian.
Yes. In such a situation it is reasonable to continue discussing
- contrary to a situation where the majority actively prefers to
not change change the current situation.
--
Henning Makholm "... popping pussies into pies
Wouldn't do in my shop
just the thought of it's enough to make you sick
and I'm telling you them pussy cats is quick ..."
Reply to: