Re: Short descriptions of GR proposals on ballot
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 02:20:01PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> That was my initial reaction too, but it is true only at the most
> mechanical level. If "further discussion" wins, it could mean either
> 3. A 3:1 supermajority want to fix the problem in some way or
> another, but they disagree internally about which of the
> proposals is a good fix.
They must not just disagree about which proposals are good, but for each
proposal there's another significant group who think that that proposal
would actively harm debian.
Maybe that's obvious, but it still might be worth repeating.