Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003
Raphael Hertzog <email@example.com> writes:
> It's not a question of opposing the previous choice but it's fair to
> leave a chance to those who have not voted the first time (me included)
> to express their disagreeement.
Hrm, I wonder, where was the part the first time that you didn't have
> I have to say that when one needs to vote on a "change of a foundation
> text", he needs to see a diff of the change and a set of rationale why
> those changes were proposed. The absence of those elements directly led
> to my decision to not vote... I've let people who had enough time to
> have read the thread vote for me...
Really? Why didn't you bother to do it yourself? Or vote against it?