[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge -- re-vote?

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 11:35:02AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Jochen Voss]
> > By the way, what was the meaning of "editorial" in
> > "Editorial changes to the Social Contract GR"?
> Normally, in a political vote, "editorial change" is used to get
> people to believe that a controversial change isn't, giving a minority
> a better chance to get their vote passed while no-one is looking.

Sad but this is true real life story.

> Re-vote?

I second re-vote.  (If this is allowed.)  

I still feel like a bad looser by stating this though.

(Also I wonder why 3:1 majority vote has the same low quorum as normal 
 vote. Anyone can point me to previous thread?)


PS: I do not think many did not understand these outcomes. I also do not
    believe this was intentional deception.  Too much noise was there.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: