Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
email@example.com (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> I don't see a mess. Ted Ts'o tried to apply an inappropriate standard
> to the question of fonts, and got an absurd result. I think it was
> just a simple mistake. Ted's a really smart guy, and I think he just
> automatically substituted the GPL's definition of "source code",
> without realizing or even noticing that the DFSG does not have that
> Once one realizes that, the problem evaporates (and with it, the
> "current mess").
Why do you think so? I'd still like to have some hinted non-METAFONT
DFSG-compliant fonts. And I view the lack thereof an actual problem
which has bothered me for a long time.
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, di-ve.com, netscape.net,
postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr.