[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SC changes

* Thomas Bushnell, BSG (tb@becket.net) [040402 07:10]:
> So, can we discuss the different sections separately, and then perhaps
> replace the current proposals (much of which I do like) with
> section-by-section consideration, so that we can get each section as
> good as possible?  

I'd certainly like that.

   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to: