Re: Why Anthony Towns is wrong
Adam Majer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >I think we need to get rid of paragraph 5 entirely. It's purpose has
> >long since been served; and those who would like it to remain are
> >themselves not happy with the compromise.
> This is *not* up to you alone. That's why we have the voting
> thingy. You can vote. I can vote. Ahhh, the privilege of The Great
> Debian Nation.
Where on earth did I suggest it was up to me alone? Here I am,
participating in a discussion about an open proposal, which includes
"drop paragraph 5 of the SC", and I give my reasons why I think it
should be done, and you think I'm somehow arguing that it's up to me