[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "keep non-free" proposal

On 2004-03-09 06:07:36 +0000 Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

I would gladly have seen a ballot of the like of :
   A) drop non-free, do not create non-free.org, stop any relationship
   with non-free related .debs.

   B) drop non-free and create non-free.org

Would a GR that tried to compel actions by other groups be valid? Is this GR trying to commit the project to producing non-free.org?

   C) keep non-free, but take a more active hand in examining and
   removing stuff from non-free. [snip!]

Too vague. I tried to discuss this sort of option with you in January, but you weren't really willing (see my email in a few seconds). I'm sorry that no-one thought it important enough to form into something on this ballot for you, but you could have done that too.

MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at
 Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/

Reply to: