I would gladly have seen a ballot of the like of : A) drop non-free, do not create non-free.org, stop any relationship with non-free related .debs. B) drop non-free and create non-free.org
Would a GR that tried to compel actions by other groups be valid? Is this GR trying to commit the project to producing non-free.org?
C) keep non-free, but take a more active hand in examining and removing stuff from non-free. [snip!]
Too vague. I tried to discuss this sort of option with you in January, but you weren't really willing (see my email in a few seconds). I'm sorry that no-one thought it important enough to form into something on this ballot for you, but you could have done that too.
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/