Re: "keep non-free" proposal
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: "keep non-free" proposal
- From: MJ Ray <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:07:33 +0000
- Message-id: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <20040309060736.GK25704@lambda>
On 2004-03-09 06:07:36 +0000 Sven Luther <email@example.com>
I would gladly have seen a ballot of the like of :
A) drop non-free, do not create non-free.org, stop any relationship
with non-free related .debs.
B) drop non-free and create non-free.org
Would a GR that tried to compel actions by other groups be valid? Is
this GR trying to commit the project to producing non-free.org?
C) keep non-free, but take a more active hand in examining and
removing stuff from non-free. [snip!]
Too vague. I tried to discuss this sort of option with you in January,
but you weren't really willing (see my email in a few seconds). I'm
sorry that no-one thought it important enough to form into something
on this ballot for you, but you could have done that too.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ firstname.lastname@example.org
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/