Re: "keep non-free" proposal
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:58:27AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:40:18PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > That's part of what this proposal is all about.
> > When we've dropped non-free, it's just Debian, no need to differentiate
> > between 'Debian', 'the Debian project', 'the Debian distribution' or
> > 'the non-free component of the Debian distribution'.
> Except, none of the introduced proposals get rid of this issue.
> One of them hides the current most glaring instance of it, but that's
> not the same thing.
> Or maybe you don't consider the debian servers [and their contents]
> to be part of debian?
What are you talking about?