[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR status

MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> writes:

> On 2004-02-26 06:36:57 +0000 Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
> wrote:
>> 	Yes, I did get that from the web page. Coomon sense seems to
>> indicate that we can either cease active support of the non-free
>> section (editing the SC as needed), or we can reaffirm our commitment
>> to non-free and continue to provide it.
> Modifying the amendment to delete part or all of the original proposal
> does not seem to be one of the Secretary's powers, or do you consider
> wording just a matter of procedure? If the amendment wishes to delete
> things, *it should say so*, as previous amendments have.

Well, the secretary can use his mind to not do something that is
not meaningful.

>>> As it does to me. That is why I think it useless, too.
>> 	I fail to see how you could arrive at that illogical
>> conclusion, but hey.
> It delays the vote in order to add a second "status quo" option to the
> ballot.

Not sure it delays the vote, and I, as several others, want to clearly
state that we want to continue our support of the non-free archive, GR
are made for this.

Rémi Vanicat

Reply to: