Re: GR status
* Anthony Towns (email@example.com) [040223 04:40]:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:52:10PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Editorial amendments to the social contract
> > I believe that both of these GRs can begin the SRP immediately. They
> > were designed to be mutually independent so they can run in parallel.
> I know I've been avoiding commenting on the editorial changes in any
> detail while it's unclear what we actually want to social contract to
> say; I suspect others have done likewise. I'll certainly be advocating
> further discussion if the editorial changes issue comes to vote before
> the non-free issue's been decided.
Also true for me.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
- GR status
- From: Andrew Suffield <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Re: GR status
- From: Anthony Towns <email@example.com>