Re: GR status

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [040223 04:40]:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:52:10PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Editorial amendments to the social contract
> 
> > I believe that both of these GRs can begin the SRP immediately. They
> > were designed to be mutually independent so they can run in parallel.

> I know I've been avoiding commenting on the editorial changes in any
> detail while it's unclear what we actually want to social contract to
> say; I suspect others have done likewise. I'll certainly be advocating
> further discussion if the editorial changes issue comes to vote before
> the non-free issue's been decided.

Also true for me.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C