Proposal -- Debian should be an adjective in the social contract
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is a proposal to amend the resolution which was first posted in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200312/msg00044.html
The rationale for this proposal is given in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg01835.html
I propose the following resolution:
We will update the social contract, replacing every use of the word
"Debian" as a noun with the phrase "the Debian system".
We will add to the end of section 1 of the Social Contract the sentence:
We have created the "main" area of our archive for the Debian
system.
Here are the affected clauses, as modified:
1. The Debian System Will Remain 100% Free Software
We promise to keep the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution entirely free
software. As there are many definitions of free software, we include
the guidelines we use to determine if software is "free" below. We
will support our users who develop and run non-free software on
the Debian system, but we will never make the system depend on an
item of non-free software. We have created the "main" area of our
archive for the Debian system.
5. Programs That Don't Meet Our Free-Software Standards
We acknowledge that some of our users require the use of programs
that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines. We
have created "contrib" and "non-free" areas in our FTP archive for
this software. The software in these directories is not part of
the Debian system, although it has been configured for use with the
Debian system. We encourage CD manufacturers to read the licenses
of software packages in these directories and determine if they
can distribute that software on their CDs. Thus, although non-free
software isn't a part of the Debian system, we support its use,
and we provide infrastructure (such as our bug-tracking system and
mailing lists) for non-free software packages.
______________________________________________________________________
Thanks,
- --
Raul
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBQBptJfK/+Baey4gJAQF+aQgAgBz55pMflBOGp0kJ9fiRv9mxug5tgtYF
GVdw0cwN9wVh1T695MLOV9Ae5lmEkIxohYFuJ/UEZkSu6obCyfFgRPlU4s7apYvW
pDnWnsjAPTP9jcZ/ECcrhU5ec7aSkMxNUlK4PSdMXdWHKt8xTI8eZIt7x+5p1MdE
6E9sgX2cITTUUbJLn3KozVsooQLcOwlXj92UZBXJjZJXiYFPnIBb4omGr6HGzJPN
SrixGxwkOMuHB2KWbfkchUvY+0T3AMakTjuoxRB1SrRnIiRbQlXn9zmZtNTa/EqX
NWSJaQ8DoVa3w+rh3s7mvWTdQJtdAlMTDoLMR7vNPzrMjK1/M2j72g==
=xbKT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: