Re: non-free and users?

[Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:32:37PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> One of the most blatent examples of this logical flaw is that a system
> of ethics which prohibits us from distributing any of non-free would
> have us not distribute GFDL licensed documentation.

Where's the flaw in that? We probably *are* going to chuck GFDL
licensed documents because they're non-free (that's next on the list
of things to tackle when the question of whether or not non-free gets
dropped entirely is settled). Seems perfectly consistent to me.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature