Re: non-free and users?
Raul Miller wrote:
Software is all of what we distribute.
Why not to insert something like this into the SC? I think this will
make things much clear.
Otherwise, there would be no point to our free software guidelines.
Why not? I may be wrong, but before GFDL most of free program
documentation was distributed with the same license as the program.
That's why there was no need to differentiate this in DFSG.
Anyway, I do not think that "dropping non-free" and "GFDL (non)freeness"
are related topics, except both of topics depend on SC and DFSG.
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov