> > 5. Programs that don't meet our free-software standards > > Should this say "Software that doesn't" instead? Perhaps I missed this in all of the GFDL discussions of the past, but does documentation == software? If we're cleaning up the social contract, I wonder if we need to go one step further. "Software and data that does not", or something else. If it's been agreed that everything that Debian distributes is software (I can live with that), please disregard. Thanks, Dale -- Dale E. Martin, Clifton Labs, Inc. Senior Computer Engineer dmartin@cliftonlabs.com http://www.cliftonlabs.com pgp key available
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature