Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
On 2004-01-11 07:34:37 +0000 Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
No, that's a major PITA to our developers. (I said the above.)
So what were you calling a major PITA to our users, then?
Did someone say 124 developers had packages in non-free? That's not an
insignificant portion of our developers, you know.
"insignificant" is a noise word unless you define what you see as
PTS is a developer tool, not a user tool.
I'm sure users use it too. Is there any particular reason it is
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ email@example.com
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/