On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:24:16PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 01:04:33PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > > But what problem(s) are you solving, and how is this a better solution > > > than any of the other proposals? > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:57:14PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > What's your definition of a "problem"? > > In this context, I imagine it's two or more ideals or goals which are > apparently in conflict because people don't bother to examine the nature > of the goals. [So maybe "dilemma" would be a better word than "problem".] So, it is your contention that the only reason that a dispute over removing non-free exists is because some people are too intellectually lazy to understand the purposes of the Project? Is there an officially sanctioned exegesis of the Social Contract that I can consult so that I may practice more correct thinking? Or will consultation and prayer with the rabbinical council that opposes the GR suffice? -- G. Branden Robinson | You can have my PGP passphrase when Debian GNU/Linux | you pry it from my cold, dead branden@debian.org | brain. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Adam Thornton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature