Re: GR: Removal of non-free
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:01:34 -0500, Branden Robinson <email@example.com> said:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 11:32:44PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 21:09:04 +0000, MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> > On 2004-01-02 18:47:50 +0000 Raul Miller <email@example.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Has someone asked you to create [or re-create] non-free?
>> > You seemed to claim that supporters of this GR should do so
>> > before it is passed. If that is incorrect, sorry but then it
>> > seems your messages confused me.
>> Oh, you don't have to. But you may get more votes if you do
> Not everything is an exercise in electioneering.
I see. So, anything beyond the original proposal, where you
try to convince people that the proposal is a good idea, is merely a
paltry exercise in electioneering?
In that case, you are doing a yoeman job of electioneering.
"Well, social relevance is a schtick, like mysteries, social
relevance, science fiction..." Art Spiegelman
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C