Re: Another Non-Free Proposal
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:15:22PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Oddly enough, the DFSG was originally a part of the social contract.
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:38:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Are you questioning the legitimacy of the recent vote? If so, why?
Does that look like a question?
No, I'm not questioning the legitimacy of the recent vote. The vote has
identified some logical buckets into which various parts of that work
fall, and indicates we can update them independently.
I see no problem with that.
I am, however, pointing out what I see as a conceptual flaw in the idea
of using Bruce Perens' writing as *the moral basis* for modifying that
same writing.
I do see a problem there.
--
Raul
Reply to: