On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:11:31AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Oh. > > You used to need stuff from non-free in the past, and then it was ok to > have non-free, but now that you have no use for it, it should be > removed, despite maybe other people still needing it ? No, I advocated removing non-free even while I maintained packages in it. -- John