Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:39:13PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Just a datum point - I expect I'll now get lots of people contradicting
> me but one package would be a start :)
No, this is perfect.
The right way to get rid of non-free is to replace each package in
non-free in non-free with a free equivalent.
I know at least one person who would disaprove of that because it doesn't
require any special vote. And, of course, I don't know if the replacement
you proposed is completely viable. But I think you're on the right track.
Thanks,
--
Raul
Reply to: