On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:15:22PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > There are tons of those already, many in wide use. download.kde.org, > > backports.org, and the bunk backport collection all come to mind. I don't > > see this as big stumbling block. > > Both of which represent far larger efforts than non-free. So it should be trivial to do for non-free, right? If even those (moderatly sized) backports collections can be maintained. Michael