Re: Another Non-Free Proposal
On 2004-01-04 14:46:03 +0000 Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> wrote:
> > But our "non-free" includes non-software (such as fonts) and what he
> > calls
> > "semi-free" software, so you're using ambiguous terminology here.
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 10:34:54AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> There is no reason for the FDL-related debate "what is software?" to
> appear in this thread. Please do not continue with it.
But that documentation was still there in sarge's non-free when I looked,
yesterday.
And, looking at the first sixth of the Packages list sid's non-free,
just a moment ago, I see half a dozen such package.
Which brings me to: what's your point?
--
Raul
Reply to: