[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue



On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 20:11:58 -0500, Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> said: 

>> We made a promise to users; and even called it a ``contract''.  Now
>> we no longer want to keep that promise, so are we going to just
>> leave the users in the lurch, with no transition plan, no support
>> going forward? For people whoi seem to think that distributing
>> non-DFSG free software is unethical, how ethicsal is this reneging
>> on our promise?

> What part of 'We have created "contrib" and "non-free" areas in our
> FTP archive for this software.' is a promise to distribute non-free
> software?

	Are you not missing the context? Let me quote:

     We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free-software
     community. We will place their interests first in our
     priorities. We will support the needs of our users for operation
     in many different kinds of computing environment.

     We acknowledge that some of our users require the use of programs
     that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines. We
     have created "contrib" and "non-free" areas in our FTP archive
     for this software.

     Thus, although non-free software isn't a part of Debian, we
     support its use, and we provide infrastructure (such as our
     bug-tracking system and mailing lists) for non-free software
     packages.


	Now, why is it that we mention the non-free and contrib area
 just after mentioning we realize our users may require software that
 does not conform to the DFSG? Was it in the same category as "Great
 weather we are having. Good for the crop."? Or is there an
 implication that, recognizing the users need for non-free software,
 we are providing valuable services to usch users, which they have
 since come to depend on?

	You may think that the promise inherent is the social contract
 is not stated strongly enough and that we can, umm, weasel out of it,
 but I think that is not quite acting in good faith.

	manoj
-- 
God requireth not a uniformity of religion. Roger Williams
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: