On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:43:49PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 04:59, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Here is my amended proposal, further changed by incorporating > > Branden's suggestions. Would the sponsors of my proposal approve of > > this changed wording? (New sponsors are also welcome for second this > > modified proposal). > ... > > + 5.3 A Foundation Document requires a 3:1 supermajority for its > > + supercession. > > Spelling: supersession (and supersede) - the derivation is not the same > as that of concession and concede. My mistake. I do write "supersede", but for some reason "supercession" instinctively trumped "supersession". -- G. Branden Robinson | Computer security is like an onion: Debian GNU/Linux | the more you dig in, the more you branden@debian.org | want to cry. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Cory Altheide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature