[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR: Removal of non-free



On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:44:05PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > If not, how are dependencies from contrib on non-free software to be
> > treated?  Should the dependencies of contrib packages just be ignored
> > version of libc6 only available in unstable or experimental? Or should
> > contrib packages not depend explicitly on non-free packages at all? Or
> > should something else happen?
> Implementation details. This stuff should not be written into a GR,
> any more than every other change to policy.

Well, the right answers aren't obvious to me; but if no one else cares,
I'm all for dropping contrib too. That's certainly the least work.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

               Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can.
           http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004

Attachment: pgp30vIiZMRtk.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: