On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 02:42:36PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > We've tried doing it the other way around, and it hasn't been working. > > I'm pretty sure I still haven't seen anyone advocating killing off > non-free attempt to address the issue of what to do with contrib in the > years this issue's been on the table. The recent attempt attempted to > specifically avoid deciding whether to remove non-free or not. > > Work out how to address the whole problem, work out a good overall > solution, then present that as your GR. That's what we did for the revised > supermajority rules, and we got our 3:1 requirement quite happily. Why > not follow the procedure that's been demonstrated to work, even if it's > a bit hard? For the record, I am actively ignoring this "advice". -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature