On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 04:27:53AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> If you feel that there are positions which are not adequetely
> represented, there is an established procedure for you to get other
> options on the ballot.
>
> If nobody cares enough to propose or adequetely second something like
> you suggest, that's pretty much a conclusion in itself.
Certainly. But Debian's at its best when it operates by consensus formed
of persuasion and argument, not when it divides into separate camps
that can't be bothered talking to each other, and try to decide issues
on weight of numbers, rather than good sense and good outcomes.
In particular, I think you're doing yourself and your supporters a
disservice by trying to avoid addressing important issues in this matter.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
pgpG6RvfXlME7.pgp
Description: PGP signature