[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFD: amendment of Debian Social Contract

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:58:40 -0500, Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> said: 

>> Now, if this were part of the ballot; if I could chose
>> a) remove clause 5, but do not remove non-free from the archive
>> b) remove clause 5, and clear the way to remove non-free as well
>> then yes, we can remove clause 5, and clearly know whether or not
>> there was a mandate.

> I'm confused; you just said we clearly know anyway -- "people
> overwhelmingly voting to remove clause 5 would still mean a mandate
> for removal of non free.".

	Only when I did not have a choice where I can state what I
 wanted.  My proposal allows people to chose to remove clause 5 and
 explicitly state that they do not want to remove non-free.

In which level of metalanguage are you now speaking?
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: