On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:11:35AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: [rationale 13 snipped] > You might want to consider putting this up some paces. Having such a > crucial part of your RfD at position 13) of your rationale might get it > overlooked. Yeah. The rationales are numbered in the order I thought of them as I reviewed the word diff of my proposal. :) > I'm speaking out of personal experience, as I was unable to catch the > removal of Clause 5 from casually reading the word-diff and only found > out about it by having a look at Richard's nice HTML page. I agree that each change should probably be footnoted. -- G. Branden Robinson | No math genius, eh? Then perhaps Debian GNU/Linux | you could explain to me where you branden@debian.org | got these... PENROSE TILES! http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Stephen R. Notley
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature