[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFD: amendment of Debian Social Contract

Anthony Towns wrote:
>What, exactly, is the point of removing non-free from the social contract,
>if we're not going to remove non-free entirely?

To remove non-free, but not contrib?
To add new restrictions on what can be in non-free?  (Currently the only 
requirement for a package in non-free is that Debian can legally distribute 
To move non-free to a separate FTP archive (rather than "areas in our FTP 


Reply to: